@TheFundCFO Newsletter

Share this post

User's avatar
@TheFundCFO Newsletter
#209 Why Invest in Venture Capital? Making A Simple Case for FAs / RIAs

#209 Why Invest in Venture Capital? Making A Simple Case for FAs / RIAs

Doug Dyer's avatar
Doug Dyer
Jan 16, 2025
βˆ™ Paid
6

Share this post

User's avatar
@TheFundCFO Newsletter
#209 Why Invest in Venture Capital? Making A Simple Case for FAs / RIAs
1
Share

πŸ‘‹ Hi, I’m Doug! Welcome to @TheFundCFO crew! Every Tuesday/[Thursday], we publish VC/CFO insights that matter - highlights from notable VC GPs, LPs, and CFOs/finance pros. Check out our VC Fund Playbooks, Models, Budgets, & Compliance Checklists @ AirstreamAlpha Products!

Need more help? Check out Fund CFO Support provided by the Airstream Alpha Team.

Love what we’re doing? Consider upgrading to paid for deeper dives on Thursdays (most paid subscribers expense these insights!). Top posts:

  • #203 VC Fund Model: DPI Forecast Template

  • #202 VC Fund Math Revisited

  • #201 VC News, YC, & The Future of Venture Capital

Upgrade to paid

Share


Michael Jordan, Guard (1982-84)

Picture of the Day: UNC Basketball Great Michael Jordan & Coach Dean Smith


Why Invest in Venture Capital? 20% Net. Making The Case for FAs / RIAs

Earlier this week, I was catching up with a UNC basketball legend (not the ones pictured, but close!) turned investment advisor / strategist. He asked a very simple question:

Why invest in venture capital or any private alternatives funds for that matter?

It’s a good question. For all of the folks reading, today you have options:

  • Invest in US Treasuries for a risk-free return of 5%

  • Buy a low cost S&P 500 ETF for a 10% target return (not guaranteed)

Simply put, to invest in venture capital, you should believe there is a path to 15%-20% annual returns, or a >5% premium to public markets.

Good news: studies show that this can be done if you pick your investments well!


Back to Fund Models - What is the Math Behind >20%?

How do you do generate >15-20% returns in venture capital? You need a fund model (more below)! Here’s a simple example for the back of the napkin:

  • $50m fund invests in 25 companies at $2m each (assumes recycling of fees)

  • Each $2m investment is at a $20m valuation

  • Own 10% of each company at investment (you own 5% at exit after dilution)

  • $5 billion of exit outcomes (IPO or sale); your 5% is worth $250m

  • Returns: MOIC of 5x gross ($250m/$50m), 4.2x net ($210m/$50m)

  • IRR of 22% gross, 20% net (assumes 8 years to exit)

Key question: do you believe your venture capital fund can generate $5 billion of exit outcomes? Does your fund model support the claim that you can generate the 15-20% net return required by investors?


How VC Really Works: Returns Are Driven by Power Law

For years, we’ve been saying that every VC fund manager needs a fund model (portfolio construction and reserves). Why? A fund model provides a plan for investing, is often required by investors, and can drive outsized returns (and help avoid value-destroying mistakes)!

While our fund models typically get super-detailed with various scenarios in play, we always find it helpful to simplify VC fund math (credit Fred Wilson in 2008) to something like the following:

  • 1/3 of your investments lose money

  • 1/3 of your investments breakeven

  • 1/3 of your investments make money, with β€œ~6% of investments generating ~60% of total returns” (credit Chris Dixon on the power law, citing Horsley Bridge industry data)

This point can’t be overstated! In a VC fund portfolio with 30 investments, this means that ~2 companies will drive ~60% of the total returns.

You need to hit home runs to deliver superior performance to your investors!


VC Losses Are Real, But Dwarfed by Outperformance

James Health (VC Principal at Multi-Family Office in London) share insights (linked here) from the SuperVenture conference:

  • 🀯 The VC power law, backed up by 15+ years of data

  • πŸ“– The power law suggests a small number of investments will have an outsized impact on the total returns. It is very real

  • πŸš€ VC is an outlier asset class. Forget loss ratios. If a vintage (or fund) doesn't have its outliers, it's not going to outperform

A couple of takeaways:

  • πŸ’° The only group outperforming cost is investments returning 5.0x or more. Anything less technically isn't worth doing

  • ❌ Nearly 50% of investments made won't return the capital initially invested

  • πŸš€ 80% of the returns are made in just 18% of the investments. If the average VC portfolio is 25 companies, you are looking at your returns on one hand

  • πŸ”Ž Realised returns of LP investments in Europe between 2006 - 2022, presented by Adams Street Partners this week at SuperVenture.

chart, bar chart, funnel chart

How Can This Deal RTF? The Investing Math (Yes or No)

Every venture fund manager I know wants to deliver superior performance. Before investing in any deal, a VC fund investor should ask: β€œHow can this deal RTF? Or 2x, 3x RTF? What do I need to believe about the future for that to happen?”

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to @TheFundCFO Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
Β© 2025 Doug Dyer
Privacy βˆ™ Terms βˆ™ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share